Back to Basics

Wow! It has been a while since my last post! Oh, well. Such is the hectic life of the bi-vocational pastor.

One of the areas that has occupied my time lately has been studying the arguments, from both sides of the aisle, pertaining to a particular issue in the area of bibliology. It is troubling that so much pulpit time and study time is wasted on an issue that is little more than what Augustine called "stirring up billows in a ladle".

Now, I'm going to take the high road here: I'm not going to discuss -- or even identify -- the particular issue. I think it would be far more useful to hone our basic thinking skills instead, for if more people would apply principles of sound reasoning (or, if you prefer, discernment) this sort of issue would never see the light of day.

The first objection that inevitably arises is, "Well, I have the Bible [or the Holy Spirit], I don't need man's logic or reason." And that sort of thinking is the root of the problem: logic and sound reasoning is not incompatible with the Bible, nor is it in competition with the Bible or the Holy Spirit. On the contrary, even the most vitriolic opponent of "human reasoning" employs that same reasoning in telling us why we don't need human reasoning.

The laws of logic (more on these later) are a part of the fabric of God's created order. You cannot deny their existence any more than you can deny the existence of gravity, thermodynamics, magnetism, et al. Indeed they are more fundamental even than these, for it is conceivable that God could have chosen to create a universe without gravity; but it is inconceivable that He could have chosen to create a universe without the laws of logic (for example, how would He create a universe in which the law of noncontradiction did not exist?).

The conflict in issues such as the one I was forced to address recently is not essentially one of those who employ logic and reason vs. those who do not; it is a conflict between those who employ logic and reason well and those who apply it badly.